DOSSIER ON CLONING

( abridged version )

 

 

 

It is not a question  between men and men: it is a question between God and men

 

 

 

    

The purpose of this dossier is to ask you to help the Pope to give the world a final definition on the part of the Magisterium on the question of cloning : without the faithful and his brethren in the episcopate, it will not be possible for him to state expressly that God is present in the spiritual soul that He creates in the first totipotent cell.    

 

Politicians have taken the lead in this abomination, because they are aware and, indeed, have taken advantage, of the fact that religious representatives have left a doctrinal gap in this matter! (with the exception of Islam, following the Islamic meeting at Cairo on July 9, 2004 !)

 

 

 

 

 

Please read the attached dossiers very carefully (this initiative comes from the authorities closest to the Holy Father in Rome),  in order to:

·       learn what you can do;

·       fully comprehend the eschatological implications of the problem;

·       grasp some manners of expressing your «sensus ecclesiae» which you can then put into your own words to your bishop;

·       ask your bishop for an audience, to suggest that, by means of a missive suited to his particular Apostolic Mission, he should help the Holy Father to produce an urgent Apostolic Letter.

 

 

 

 

 

 

NOVEMBER 26, 2000  /  In the course of the Jubileum Eucharist of the Lay-people, the Pope said: 

 

“The hour of the lay-people has come!” :

 

   Repeating the words of Paul VI in Evangelii nuntiandi, John Paul II explained that, at the outset of the third millenium, the mission of  lay-people is vast. The Pope indicated as the first field for action the problems of a bio-genetic order: «Suffice it  - he said – to think of the social conquests and the revolution in the genetic domain; economic progress and under-development, » (etc.)

 

 

 

 

 
IMMEDIATE ANIMATION ( Points to be made for a request to Rome )

 

·        The Church does not give an express pronouncement on the matter of the objective existence of the spiritual soul in the first fertilized cell or at a later moment (cf. Ev. Vitae n. 60).

·        Nevertheless, after several requests for clarification by the pastors, the Holy Father declared before the Pontifical Academy fo Life, that : «  the genome appears as the structuring and constructive element of the body in both its individual and hereditary characteristics... (... interior truth of the genome, already present) at the moment of  procreation where the genetic patrimonies of the father and mother  join ... (...)   Anthropological study leads to recognition that, by virtue of the substantial unity of body and spirit, the human genome does not have biological significance alone; it is the bearer of an anthropological dignity that is founded upon the spiritual soul WHICH IMPREGNATES IT AND VITALIZES IT. »

·        The Congregation for the Faith also replied on this same question to the Bishops of Provence, on the occasion  of their visit ad limina, that « If the soul is the vital principle and the form of a body which science shows to be human and to have individual existence as from the first instant, one cannot see how that body could subsist, and much less develop, without a human soul. » (1997)

 

·          Nevertheless, these texts are limited to a degree of authority that does not make it possible to declare that the “express” position of the Church is universally such that the first cell is the place of the creation by God of the spiritual and immortal soul. 

 

·       In this «express» manner, actually the Church only takes a stand on a moral plane (for instance, manipulation of embryos, attacks against life, abortions, etc…); on a legal plane (defense of the dignity of life, respect due to the person); and on a bio-ethical plane; but not on the objective metaphysical plane, or even by an approach on a theological plane.

 

·       To be able to do this, Rome needs to know that God’s People, and their pastors, are concerned about this matter, her ethical position being far from sufficient to stem the advance of the “culture of death”.

 

·       Hence the importance of removing all the problems underlying this gap resulting from a universal negligence by Catholicism concerning the human being and its origin.

 

·        Care must be taken with the ontological position ( confusion between « being » and « life » ) and the respective « theological » one:  “fideism”. That position will say that God the Creator is certainly present in our world and in our human time, in which He continually creates what He makes exist, using this truth ( the «continuum» of God’s creation in man ) to discard that other very special, living and sacred Presence of God, immediate in time, where He gives LIFE by creating it in man   ( created gift of the spiritual soul ).

 

Hence, this IMMEDIATE CREATION OF THE SOUL SHOULD BE BELIEVED AS A MATTER OF FAITH ( «Humani generis» of Pius XII ), and is not opposed to the idea of the CONTINUAL CREATION of the human being (conservation in the being ).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SHIQOUTSIM MESHOMEM

(“the abominations of desolation” : Dn 9.27, Mt 24,15 & Mc 13,14)

Daniel 9, 26-27:  (APPARITION OF THE ARCHANGEL GABRIEL TO THE PROPHET DANIEL)

Literal analytical translation, word for word, from Greek and Hebrew.

( Daniel asked: « when will the “Day of the Lord” come ?

« after 62 weeks : the messiah. He will be killed. That will not be His (day). The people (some Men) with «the chief …etc »

Matthew 24,15 ( Jesus stresses the importance of discernment, on the part of those who “read”, as to what is represented by the holy place involved by the future abomination of desolation prophesied in Daniel ).

«Now, when you see that which the prophet Daniel called the abomination of desolation, set up in the holy place (let him who reads this recognize what it –that “holy place”– means) …


Mark 13:14 ( idem )

« When you see the abomination of desolation standing where it should never stand, – let him who reads this recognize»!!

 

A /  The biblical phophesies concerning this event :The shiqoutsim meshomem (translated as “the abominations of desolation”) are the worst acts that mankind can produce. These acts imply four conditions

They are established by the public authorities;

They entail man introducing into a sacred place, by his force and art, a construction of his own ( 1M 1,49 )

This sacred place, however, is per se reserved for the work/operation and the creative presence of God alone : for instance, such would be the Holy of Holies of the Temple at Jerusalem;

  These ultimate abominations are to be perpetrated after the birth of the Messiah and his suppression, and precede and cause the “Day of the Lord” (Dn 9,27 ; 11,31 ; 12,11 )

 

B / The interpretation of Christ in Jn 2,21:

 "But the temple he was speaking of was his own body." (The Temple of Jerusalem was destroyed in 70 AD). 

 

The Synagogue teaches that the true Temple « will not be a edifice built of stone, but one that is fashioned from heaven by the Lord himself» (R. Moses Alschehh, on II Sam VII, 4 et seq).

  To be more precise: « according to the opinion of all the sages of Israel, it is a constant, certain, irrefutable truth that God gives, by sending it from heaven, the pure soul to every man as from the beginning of his formation in the mother’s womb ». Rabbi Manassé ben Israel

 

   Speaking before the pontifical Academy, the Pope confirms, in this respect, the scientific and religious consensus :  the spiritual soul created by God is the basis on which the dignity of the human being is founded, this soul impregnates and vivifies the genome, as from the first cell (28/2/1998)  [CONSULT OFFICIAL ENGLISH TEXT OF VATICAN ]

 

   Hence, Christians are in agreement with the Jewish tradition when they deduce that the “true Temple” is the body of the Son of Man :

Jesus Christ Himself had given this interpretation when explaining that it is the human body that is the real sanctuary designated by the revealed scriptures.

The only passage in Scripture is this one, and it is John the Evangelist who explains :

“ the temple he (Jesus) was speaking of was his own body ”. Jn 2,21.

 

   For Christ and for Jewish traditions, therefore, the abomination of desolation can only mean what is reserved to God alone on the altar of the “Holy of Holies” of the body of the Son of Man :

 

When the public autorities decide that man’s artifice can be set up in that holy place to act where only God and His creative presence are permitted to operate

(creation of the spiritual soul, gift of life and of being, unity of body and spirit, impregnation and vivification of the genome by the spiritual soul immediately created by God on the “altar” of the genome),

we are at the heart of what divine Revelation has announced to us for over 2,500 years : the famous, unacceptable SHIQOUTSIM MESHOMEM (abominations of desolation).

 

 

 

C/  A mere ethical problem, or a metaphysical and eschatological threat?

 

   These parliamentary bills fall into a category that has been described as “bio ethical”.

   This term is no longer applicable to the gravity of the matter, which entails the binding and sacred decision of all mankind.

Moreover, the matter calls for vigorous affirmation of universal religious indignation, and the distancing of all the sages, all the metaphysical authorities, political and religious, for the defence of the rights of the Creator and for the survival of mankind.

 

1 /  The rights of the Creator :

By introducing into the female ovule a new totipotent nucleus not originating from the ontological weight of the unity in complementarity of two sexually differentiated human beings, one would be causing God to vivify the body of a new child without that body expressing its provenance from “His image : unity of life and love”, which in fact is no longer inscribed in the origin of that body….

 

2 /  The rights of the innocent human being.

By obliging the Creator to cooperate in His own Creative act in a metaphysical transgression, which in addition would engender the life of man in a genome that is no longer adapted to guarding in the memory of its body the paternal hallmark of Him who is giving him life, one is seeking to deprive the unnatural human being of its gravest right, that of being, in its body and, therefore, in its whole person, the image and likeness of God.

 

This, without taking into account the  fact that it is placed in the position of being incapable of bearing in its original body the unity of all of Nature and the universe in which it is inscribed as a man:

 

3 /  The rights of Nature

 

The whole universe bases its unity, its balance, its harmony in accord with the perfections of the original body of man; if man, by means of a collective decision, or a public one, grants himself permission to enter into the Sanctuary of Life reserved to God alone, he establishes an internal contradiction in the laws governing the whole of nature… and in the rules governing the morpho-genetic fields of the human race as a whole and also each of its members….

 

In deregulating, by means of an internal contradiction, the heart and the place of unity of all the anthropic laws of our universe with the creative laws of God, is there not a risk of doing harm to the harmonies of the ensemble of laws of the universe which are correlative to those of the spiritualized body of man?  Cf.: the epistem(olog)ical unity established today between man and his origin and his end, on the one hand, and the laws of unity of the universe, on the other? (Cf.: Barrow : “le Principe anthropique” (the anthropic Principle); Jacques Desmarets & Dominique Lambert; “The anthropic Principle”; works of Hawkings and other international discussions on this subject).

 

Is there not a risk of introducing a disruption in the unity of the constants of natural laws, on the plane of energies, on the ondulatory plane, on that of the fundamental movements of the universe, with major repercussions on the elements of elementary matter that would thereby be marked immediately to the farthest limits of our universe ?

 

 

 

 

Nature will not fail to revolt against our human kind with a violence that will no longer surprise anyone.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DOSSIER CLONAGE( version allégée)


Ce n’est pas une affaire entre les hommes et les hommes,

C’est une affaire entre DIEU et les Hommes.

Ce dossier a pour but de vous demander d'aider le pape à apporter au monde une définition définitive du magistère sur la question du clonage : sans les fidèles et ses confrères dans l'épiscopat, il ne pourra pas dire expressément que Dieu est présent à l'âme spirituelle qu'Il crée dans la 1ère cellule totipotente.

Très embêtant, parce que les politiciens s'engouffrent dans cette abomination en sachant et surtout en profitant que les représentants religieux  proposent un vide doctrinal sur la question!!! ( sauf l'Islam depuis la réunion islamique du Caire le… 9 juillet 2004 ! )

   Bref, faites une lecture plus qu'attentive des dossiers joints (cette initiative vient des autorités romaines les plus proches du St Père ) pour :

- apprendre ce que vous pourriez faire   

-comprendre l'étendue eschatologique du problème

- saisir des modèles d'expression de votre « sensus ecclesiae » à faire parvenir avec vos mots à vous à votre évêque

- solliciter une entrevue avec lui, pour lui suggérer par une missive appropriée à sa Mission apostolique, d' aider le St Père à produire une lettre apostolique d'urgence 

26 NOV 2000  /  Au cours de l'Eucharistie du Jubilé des laïcs le pape avait déclaré : “l'heure des laïcs a sonné !":

Jean-Paul II a expliqué, reprenant les paroles de Paul VI, dans Evangelii nuntiandi, qu'à l'aube du troisième millénaire, la mission des laïcs est immense. Le pape a donné comme premier champ d'action les problématiques d'ordre bio génétiques : »Il suffit a-t-il dit de penser aux conquêtes sociales et à la révolution dans le domaine génétique progrès économique et sous-développement (etc..)

     
ANIMATION IMMEDIATE
  ( JALONS POUR UNE DEMANDE A Rome/ )

-  L’Eglise ne se détermine pas de manière expresse sur la question de l’existence objective de l’âme spirituelle dans la 1ère cellule fécondée, ou dans un moment ultérieur  (cf. Ev. Vitae n°60)

-Néanmoins, après plusieurs demandes de clarification des pasteurs, le St Père a précisé, devant l’Académie pontificale pour la vie, que le :  « génome apparaît comme l’élément structurant et constructif du corps en ses caractéristiques tant individuelles qu’héréditaires …(….vérité intérieure du génome, déjà présente ) au moment de la procréation où les patrimoines génétiques du père et de la mère s’unissent …(….) L’approfondissement anthropologique porte à reconnaître que, en vertu de l’unité substantielle du corps et de l’esprit, le génome humain n’a pas seulement une signification biologique ; il est porteur d’une dignité anthropologique qui trouve son fondement dans l’âme spirituelle QUI L’IMPREGNE ET LE VIVIFIE. »

 

La Congrégation pour la Foi a également répondu à cette même question aux évêques de Provence lors de leur visite ad limina  que  «  Si l’âme est le principe vital et la forme d’un corps dont la science révèle l’humanité et l’existence individuelle dès le premier instant, on ne voit pas comment ce corps pourrait subsister, et encore moins se développer, sans une âme humaine. »  (1997 )

 

Néanmoins ces textes restent limités à un degré d’autorité qui ne permet pas encore de déclarer que la position « expresse » de l’Eglise soit universellement celle selon laquelle c’est bien la 1ère cellule qui est le lieu de la création par Dieu de l’âme spirituelle et immortelle.

 

-  De cette manière « expresse », en fait, l’Eglise ne s’exprime que sur un plan moral  (Ce sont des manipulations embryonnaires, des atteintes à la vie, des avortements etc…),  sur un plan juridique  (défense  de  la  dignité  de  la  vie,  respect    à  la personne)   et sur un plan dit bioéthique,  mais pas sur le plan métaphysique objectif, même pas en se plaçant sur le plan théologique.

 

- Pour ce faire,  Rome a besoin de savoir que le Peuple de Dieu,  et ses pasteurs,   se préoccupent de cette question,   sa position éthique étant largement insuffisante à enrayer le processus de la  « culture de mort ».

 

-D’où  l’importance  de  soulever tous les problèmes  sous-jacents  à cette lacune  résultant d’une universelle négligence de la catholicité concernant l’être humain à son origine.

 

-Attention à la position ontologiste ( confusion entre « être » et « vie » ) et son correspondant « théologique » : le fidéisme . Elle dira que Dieu Créateur est certes présent à notre monde et à notre temps humain en ce qu’Il crée continuellement ce qu’il fait exister, utilisant cette vérité ( le « continuum » de la création de Dieu dans l’homme ) pour écarter cette autre Présence très spéciale, vivante et sacrée  de Dieu,  immédiate dans le temps,  où Il donne en la créant la VIE en l’homme  ( don créé de l’âme spirituelle )

 

-Pourtant, cette  CREATION IMMEDIATE  DE  L’AME  DOIT ETRE CRUE DE FOI ( « Humani generis »  de Pie XII ) et elle ne S’OPPOSE  pas à l'idée de la  CREATION  CONTINUELLE de l'être humain ( conservation dans l’être ).



Shiqoutsim Meshomèm

COMMUNIQUE  à toute personne humaine et responsable.

Shiqoutsim Meshomèm :  “ les abominations de la désolation ”( Dn 9,27), (Mt 24,15  & Mc 13,14)


Daniel 9 :26-27:  ( APPARITION DE L’ANGE GABRIEL AU PROPHETE DANIEL )

 Traduction littérale analytique à partir du mot à mot grec et hébreu

( Daniel demandait : « quand viendra donc le « Jour du Seigneur » ? » )

« après 62 semaines :  le messie. Il sera tué. Ce ne sera pas Son (jour). Le peuple (des Hommes) avec « le chef qui doit venir va disloquer la  Cité et le Sanctuaire et le terme de tout cela : c’est le « cataclysme et c’est la désolation qui s’installe jusqu’à la fin.

« Le chef consolidera un pacte avec les multitudes pendant une semaine. Et dans la moitié d’une « semaine il va défaire  l’Hostie vivante et le Sacrifice vivant : c’est que dans le Temple il y aura « l’Abomination de la Désolation et cette  désolation persévèrera jusqu’à la fin et la consommation de « toute chose. »

 

Matthieu 24:15  ( Jésus souligne l’importance d’un discernement chez ceux qui «  lisent  », sur ce que représente le lieu saint concerné par la future abomination de la désolation prophétisée à Daniel )

« C'est pourquoi, lorsque vous verrez l'abomination de la désolation, dont a parlé le prophète Daniel, « établie en lieu Saint  (par excellence), -que celui qui lit discerne ce que (ce lieu Saint représente). »

 

 

Marc 13:14 ¶ (  idem)

« Lorsque vous verrez l'abomination de la désolation établie là où elle ne doit pas être, -que celui qui « lit comprenne ! ! »

 

A / Les prophéties bibliques qui concernent cet événement

 

Les shiqoutsim meshomèm, ce sont  les actes les pires que l’humanité puisse produire 

 ( traduire “  les abominations de la désolation ” ) Elles impliquent quatre conditions :  

Elles sont établies par les pouvoirs publics.

Elles impliquent que l’homme introduise dans un lieu sacré, par sa force et par son art, une construction qui lui soit propre. ( 1M 1,49 )

Ce lieu sacré est pourtant réservé de soi à l’opération et à la présence créatrice de Dieu seul : ce sera le Saint des Saints du Temple de Jérusalem par exemple.

 Ces abominations ultimes doivent se  réaliser après la naissance du Messie et sa suppression, et  précèdent  en le provoquant le “ Jour du Seigneur ” (Dn 9,27 ;11,31 ;12,11)

 

B / L’interprétation du Christ dans Jn 2, 21 :(Le Temple de Jérusalem a été détruit en 7O).

Jn 2 :21  Mais il parlait du temple de son corps. 

 

 

La Synagogue enseigne que le véritable Temple « ne sera pas un édifice de pierres, mais ce qui est façonné du ciel par le Seigneur lui-même» ( R. Moïse Alschehh,  sur  II Sam VII, 4 svts ).

Et plus précisément : « de l’avis de tous les sages d’Israël, c’est une vérité constante, certaine, incontestable que Dieu donne, l’envoyant du ciel, l’âme pure à tout homme dès le principe de sa formation dans le sein maternel » Rabbi Manassé ben Israël…

 

Le pape devant l’Académie pontificale confirme en ce sens le consensus scientifique et religieux : l’âme spirituelle créée par Dieu est le fondement  de la dignité de l’être humain,  cette âme imprègne et vivifie le génome, dès la première cellule (28/2/1998)

 

Les chrétiens s’accordent enfin avec la tradition juive pour induire que le “ véritable Temple ”, c’est le corps du fils de l’Homme :

Jésus, le Christ, avait donné lui-même cette interprétation en expliquant que c’est le corps humain qui est le véritable sanctuaire désigné par les écritures révélées…

L’unique passage de l’Ecriture est celui-ci, et c’est Jean l’évangéliste qui explique :

“ En réalité, lui ( Jésus ), il parlait du Temple de son corps ” Jn 2, 21

Pour le Christ et les traditions juives, l’abomination de la désolation ne peut donc concerner que ce qui est réservé à Dieu seul sur l’autel du “ Saint des Saints ” du corps du fils de l’homme :

 

 

 Quand la puissance publique décide que l’artifice de l’homme peut s’établir en ce lieu sacré pour opérer là où seuls Dieu et sa présence créatrice sont habilités à opérer

( création de l’âme spirituelle, don de la vie et de l’être , unité du corps et de l’esprit, imprégnation et vivification du génome par l’âme spirituelle immédiatement créée par Dieu sur “ l’autel ” du génome), 

nous sommes au cœur de ce que nous annonce la Révélation divine depuis plus de 2500 ans :   les fameuses et inacceptables  SHIQOUTSIM MESHOMÈM  (abominations de la désolation)

 

C / Simple problème éthique, ou  menace métaphysique et eschatologique ?

 

Ces ( projets de ) lois s’inscrivent dans un cadre  baptisé  du mot de “ bio éthique ”.

Terme qui ne convient plus à la gravité de la question, laquelle relève de la décision solidaire et sacrée de toute l’humanité.

En outre, elle appelle la vigoureuse affirmation de l’indignation religieuse universelle, et la démarcation de tous les sages, de toutes les autorités métaphysiques, politiques, et religieuses, pour la défense des droits du Créateur et pour la survie de l’humanité.

 

1/ Les droits du Créateur :

 En introduisant dans l’ovule féminin un nouveau noyau totipotent, ne provenant pas du poids ontologique de l’unité de complémentarité de deux êtres humains différenciés sexuellement, on provoquerait Dieu à vivifier le corps du nouvel enfant sans que ce corps exprime sa provenance de  “ son image : unité de vie et d’amour ”, qui de fait n’est plus inscrite dans l’origine de ce corps …

 

2 / Les droits de l’être humain innocent 

En obligeant le Créateur à coopérer en son acte Créateur même à une transgression métaphysique, qui par surcroît engendrerait la vie de l’homme dans un génome qui n’est plus adapté à garder en la mémoire de son corps la marque paternelle de Celui qui lui donne la vie, on cherche à priver  l'être humain abominé du droit le plus grave, celui d’être en son corps, et donc en toute sa personne, image et ressemblance de Dieu.

Sans compter qu’il est  mis dans l’incapacité de porter en son corps originel l’unité de toute la nature et de  l’univers dans lequel il est inscrit comme homme :

 

3/ Les droits de la Nature

Tout l’univers trouve son unité, son équilibre, son harmonie en fonction des perfections du corps originel de l’homme ; si l’homme par une décision collective, ou publique, s' accorde l'autorisation de pénétrer dans le Sanctuaire de la Vie réservé à Dieu seul, il établit une contradiction interne dans les lois de régulation de la nature entière … et dans les régulations des champs morpho-génétiques de la collectivité humaine toute entière comme de celle de chacun de ses membres….

 

En dérégulant par une contradiction interne le cœur  et le lieu de l’unité de toutes les lois anthropiques de notre univers avec les lois créatrices de Dieu, ne risque-t-on pas de porter atteinte aux harmonies  de l’ensemble des lois de l’univers qui sont corrélatives à celles du corps spiritualisé de l’homme ? cf l’unité  épistémique aujourd’hui établie entre l’homme en son origine et sa fin d’une part, et les lois de l’unité de l’univers d’autre part ? (cf Barrow : “ le Principe anthropique ” ; Jacques Desmarets & Dominique Lambert : ”Le principe anthropique ”, travaux de Hawkings et autres colloques internationaux sur ce thème).

 

Ne risque-t-on pas d’introduire une perturbation dans l’unité des constantes des lois naturelles, sur le plan des énergies, sur le plan ondulatoire, sur le plan des mouvements fondamentaux de l’univers, avec de notables répercussions sur les éléments de matière élémentaire qui s’en trouveront immédiatement marqués jusqu’aux extrêmes confins de notre univers ?

 

La nature  ne manquera pas de se révolter contre notre humanité avec une violence qui ne surprendra plus personne.

DOSSIER ON CLONING( abridged version )

It is not a question

between men and men..

It is a question between God and men.

    

The purpose of this dossier is to ask you to help the Pope to give the world a final definition on the part of the Magisterium on the question of cloning : without the faithful and his brethren in the episcopate, it will not be possible for him to state expressly that God is present in the spiritual soul that He creates in the first totipotent cell.

Politicians have taken the lead in this abomination, because they are aware and, indeed, have taken advantage, of the fact that religious representatives have left a doctrinal gap in this matter! (with the exception of Islam, following the Islamic meeting at Cairo on July 9, 2004 !)

Please read the attached dossiers very carefully (this initiative comes from the authorities closest to the Holy Father in Rome),  in order to:

·       learn what you can do;

·       fully comprehend the eschatological implications of the problem;

·       grasp some manners of expressing your «sensus ecclesiae» which you can then put into your own words to your bishop;

·       ask your bishop for an audience, to suggest that, by means of a missive suited to his particular Apostolic Mission, he should help the Holy Father to produce an urgent Apostolic Letter.

 

NOVEMBER 26, 2000  /  In the course of the Jubileum Eucharist of the Lay-people, the Pope said:  “The hour of the lay-people has come!”

 

   Repeating the words of Paul VI in Evangelii nuntiandi, John Paul II explained that, at the outset of the third millenium, the mission of  lay-people is vast. The Pope indicated as the first field for action the problems of a bio-genetic order: «Suffice it  - he said – to think of the social conquests and the revolution in the genetic domain; economic progress and under-development, » (etc.)


IMMEDIATE ANIMATION

( Points to be made for a request to Rome )

·        The Church does not give an express pronouncement on the matter of the objective existence of the spiritual soul in the first fertilized cell or at a later moment (cf. Ev. Vitae n. 60).

·        Nevertheless, after several requests for clarification by the pastors, the Holy Father declared before the Pontifical Academy fo Life, that : the  genome appears as the structuring and constructive element of the body in both its individual and hereditary characteristics... (... interior truth of the genome, already present) at the moment of  procreation where the genetic patrimonies of the father and mother  join ... (...)   Anthropological study leads to recognition that, by virtue of the substantial unity of body and spirit, the human genome does not have biological significance alone; it is the bearer of an anthropological dignity that is founded upon the spiritual soul WHICH IMPREGNATES IT AND VITALIZES IT. »

The Congregation for the Faith also responded on this same question to the Bishops of Provence, on the occasion  of their visit ad limina, that « If the soul is the vital principle and the form of a body which science shows to be human and to have individual existence as from the first instant, one cannot see how that body could subsist, and much less develop, without a human soul. » (1997)

 

   Nevertheless, these texts are limited to a degree of authority that does not make it possible to declare that the “express” position of the Church is universally such that the first cell is the place of the creation by God of the spiritual and immortal soul.

 

 

-In this «express» manner, actually the Church only takes a stand on a moral plane (for instance, manipulation of embryos, attacks against life, abortions, etc…); on a legal plane (defense of the dignity of life, respect due to the person); and on a bio-ethical plane; but not on the objective metaphysical plane, or even by an approach on a theological plane.


-To be able to do this, Rome needs to know that God’s People, and their pastors, are concerned about this matter, her ethical position being far from sufficient to stem the advance of the “culture of death”.

 

-Hence the importance of removing all the problems underlying this gap resulting from a universal negligence by Catholicism concerning the human being and its origin.


- Care must be taken with the ontological position ( confusion between « being » and « life » ) and the respective « theological » one:  “fideism”. That position will say that God the Creator is certainly present in our world and in our human time, in which He continually creates what He makes exist, using this truth ( the «continuum» of God’s creation in man ) to discard that other very special, living and sacred Presence of God, immediate in time, where He gives LIFE by creating it in man        ( created gift of the spiritual soul ).

 

-Hence, this IMMEDAITE CREATION OF THE SOUL SHOULD BE BELIEVED AS A MATTER OF FAITH ( «Humani generis» of Pius XII ), and is not opposed to the idea of the CONTINUAL CREATION of the human being (conservation in the being ).


SHIQOUTSIM MESHOMEM

 

COMMUNIQUÉ to all responsible human beings.

Shiqoutsim Meshomèm :  “the abominations of desolation” (Dn 9.27), (Mt 24,15 & Mc 13,14)


Daniel 9, 26-27:  (APPARITION OF ARCHANGEL GABRIEL TO THE PROPHET DANIEL)

Literal analytical translation, word for word, from Greek and Hebrew.

 

( Daniel asked: « when will the “Day of the Lord” come ? »

« after 62 weeks : the messiah. He will be killed. That will not be His (day). The people (some Men) with «the chief …….

 

 

 

 

 

( see this text in a catholic bible written in english ).

 

 

 

 

Matthew 24,15 ( Jesus stresses the importance of discernment, on the part of those who “read”, as to what is represented by the holy place involved by the future abomination of desolation prophesied in Daniel ).

«Now, when you see that which the prophet Daniel called the abomination of desolation, set up in the holy place. Let him who reads this recognize what it (–that “holy place”– means) ….»

 

Mark 13:14 ( idem )

« When you see the abomination of desolation standing where it should never stand, – let him who reads this recognize»!!

 

A /  The biblical phophesies concerning this event

 

 

The shiqoutsim meshomem are the worst acts that mankind can produce

(translated as “the abominations of desolation”). These acts imply four conditions :

·       They are established by the public authorities;

·       They entail man introducing into a sacred place, by his force and art, a construction of his own; ( 1M 1,49 )

·       This sacred place, however, is per se

reserved for the work/operation and the creative presence of God alone : for instance, such would be the Holy of Holies of the Temple at Jersualem;

·        These ultimate abominations are to be perpetrated after the birth of the Messiah and his suppression, and precede and cause the “Day of the Lord” (Dn 9,27 ;  11,31 ; 12,11 )

 

B / The interpretation of Christ in Jn 2,21: (The Temple of Jerusalem was destroyed in 70 AD).

Jn 2,21:  But the temple he was speaking of was his own body.

 

The Synagogue teaches that the true Temple « will not be a edifice built of stone, but one that is fashioned from heaven by the Lord himself» (R. Moses Alschehh, on II Sam VII, 4 et seq).

To be more precise: « according to the opinion of all the sages of Israel, it is a constant, certain, irrefutable truth that God gives, by sending it from heaven, the pure soul to every man as from the beginning of his formation in the mother’s womb ». Rabbi Manassé ben Israel …

Speaking before the pontifical Academy, the Pope confirms, in this respect, the scientific and religious consensus :  the spiritual soul created by God is the basis on which the dignity of the human being is founded, this soul impregnates and vivifies the genome, as from the first cell (28/2/1998)

 

Hence, Christians are in agreement with the Jewish tradition when they deduce that the “true Temple” is the body of the Son of Man :

Jesus Christ Himself had given this interpretation when explaining that it is the human body that is the real sanctuary designated by the revealed scriptures.

The only passage in Scripture is this one, and it is John the Evangelist who explains :

“ the temple he (Jesus) was speaking of was his own body ”. Jn 2,21.

 

 

For Christ and for Jewish traditions, therefore, the abomination of desolation can only mean what is reserved to God alone on the altar of the “Holy of Holies” of the body of the Son of Man :

 

 

When the public autorities decide that man’s artifice can be set up in that holy place to act where only God and His creative presence are permitted to operate

(creation of the spiritual soul, gift of life and of being, unity of body and spirit, impregnation and vivification of the genome by the spiritual soul immediately created by God on the “altar” of the genome),

we are at the heart of what divine Revelation has announced to us for over 2,500 years : the famous, unacceptable SHIQOUTSIM MESHOMEM (abominations of desolation).

 

C/  A mere ethical problem, or a metaphysical and eschatological threat?

These parliamentary bills fall into a category that has been described as “bio ethical”.

This term is no longer applicable to the gravity of the matter, which entails the binding and sacred decision of all mankind.

Moreover, the matter calls for vigorous affirmation of universal religious indignation, and the distancing of all the sages, all the metaphysical authorities, political and religious, for the defence of the rights of the Creator and for the survival of mankind.

 

 

1 /  The rights of the Creator :

By introducing into the female ovule a new totipotent nucleus not originating from the ontological weight of the unity in complementarity of two sexually differentiated human beings, one would be causing God to vivify the body of a new child without that body expressing its provenance from “His image : unity of life and love”, which in fact is no longer inscribed in the origin of that body….

2 /  The rights of the innocent human being.By obliging the Creator to cooperate in His own Creative act in a metaphysical transgression, which in addition would engender the life of man in a genome that is no longer adapted to guarding in the memory of its body the paternal hallmark of Him who is giving him life, one is seeking to deprive the unnatural human being of its gravest right, that of being, in its body and, therefore, in its whole person, the image and likeness of God.
This, without taking into account the  fact that it is placed in the position of being incapable of bearing in its original body the unity of all of Nature and the universe in which it is inscribed as a man:

 

3 /  The rights of Nature

The whole universe bases its unity, its balance, its harmony in accord with the perfections of the original body of man; if man, by means of a collective decision, or a public one, grants himself permission to enter into the Sanctuary of Life reserved to God alone, he establishes an internal contradiction in the laws governing the whole of nature… and in the rules governing the morpho-genetic fields of the human race as a whole and also each of its members….

 

In deregulating, by means of an internal contradiction, the heart and the place of unity of all the anthropic laws of our universe with the creative laws of God, is there not a risk of doing harm to the harmonies of the ensemble of laws of the universe which are correlative to those of the spiritualized body of man?  Cf.: the epistem(olog)ical unity established today between man and his origin and his end, on the one hand, and the laws of unity of the universe, on the other? (Cf.: Barrow : “le Principe anthropique” (the anthropic Principle); Jacques Desmarets & Dominique Lambert; “The anthropic Principle”; works of Hawkings and other international discussions on this subject).

Is there not a risk of introducing a disruption in the unity of the constants of natural laws, on the plane of energies, on the ondulatory plane, on the plane of the fundamental movements of the universe, with major repercussions on the elements of elementary matter that would thereby be marked immediately to the farthest limits of our universe ?

 

Nature will not fail to revolt against our human kind with a violence that will no longer surprise anyone.